The minimum approval mechanism implements the efficient public good allocation theoretically and experimentally
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose the minimum approval mechanism (MAM) for a standard linear public good environment with two players. Players simultaneously and privately choose their contributions to the public good in the first stage. In the second stage, they simultaneously decide whether to approve the other’s choice. Both contribute what they choose in the first stage if both players approve; otherwise, both contribute the minimum of the two choices in the first stage. The MAM multiply implements the Pareto-efficient allocation in backward elimination of weakly dominated strategies (BEWDS), limit logit agent quantal response equilibrium, subgame perfect minimax regret equilibrium, level-k thinking, and diagonalization heuristics. Moreover, the MAM is unique under plausible conditions. Overall, contributions in the MAM experiment averaged 94.9%. Quantifying subjects’ responses to the questionnaire revealed the heterogeneity of reasoning processes to be consistent with the model. JEL Classification: C72; C92; D74; H41; P43
منابع مشابه
Efficient Provision of Public Goods With Endogenous Redistribution∗
We study a balanced mechanism that is capable of implementing in Nash equilibrium all the Pareto-efficient individually rational allocations for an economy with public goods. The Government chooses a set of weights directly related to the Lindahl prices corresponding to the Paretoefficient allocation to be implemented. The mechanism then guarantees that initial endowments are re-allocated so th...
متن کاملBidding with money or action plans ? Asset allocation under strategic uncertainty ∗
We consider, theoretically and experimentally, several alternative mechanisms to allocate assets when the future value of an asset is unknown at the time of allocation because of strategic uncertainty. We compare the performance of auctions (bidding with money) for the right to play the minimum effort coordination game with a competitive allocation process where participants bid with game actio...
متن کاملBidding with money or action plans ? Asset allocation under strategic uncertainty By Katerina Sherstyuk
We study, theoretically and experimentally, alternative mechanisms to allocate assets when the future value of the asset is unknown at the time of allocation because of strategic uncertainty. We compare auctions, or bidding with money, for the right to play the minimum effort coordination game, with bidding with action (effort) proposals, where bidders with the highest proposed actions are sele...
متن کاملEfficient Provision of Public Goods with Endogenous Redistribution * Efficient Provision of Public Goods
We study a continuous and balanced mechanism that is capable of implementing in Nash equilibrium all the Pareto-efficient individually rational allocations for an economy with public goods. The Government chooses a set of weights directly related to the Lindahl prices corresponding to the Pareto-efficient allocation it wants to implement. The mechanism then guarantees that initial endowments ar...
متن کاملHybrid Allocation Mechanisms for Publicly Provided Goods
Motivated by efficiency and equity concerns, public resource managers have increasingly utilized hybrid allocation mechanisms that combine features of commonly used price (e.g., auction) and non-price (e.g., lottery) mechanisms. This study serves as an initial investigation of these hybrid mechanisms, exploring theoretically and experimentally how the opportunity to obtain a homogeneous good in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 83 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014